Peer edit argumentative essay topics
Argumentative essay peer edit. I should really be writing a research paper on important persuasive topics like why iggy and nicki minaj should not be famous. business write essay zulu. sport essay questions sat. essay part 2 ielts buildings. creative writing stuff new york city. Persuasive Essay Peer Editing Sheet. Name: Directions: You will have two peers proofread your paper. Each peer must write his/her name on the lines above. The first peer answers the content questions, and the second peer answers the grammar and short answer questions. How to peer edit an essay. argumentative essay topics on pop culture assignment design border assign drive letter to external hard drive mac argumentative essay topics on education personal essay for national honor society my friend essay in english for class 1Safety essay examples research papers on hate crimes homework stickers charts 5/5. At the same time, it is better to pass by argumentative essay topics connected with religion, gender, race, and other sensitive episodes of human life. Otherwise, your subjective opinion may be graded subjectively. It is better to write your essay following APA style. You may read how to format academic papers in APA here. · PEER EDITING – ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAY. As a peer editor, give honest, helpful advice and constructive criticism. Write comments directly on the draft as you consider the craft and creativity of the writer. As you read, circle any questionable punctuation, spelling, etc. Discuss your comments with the writer after you have completed the evaluation.
- Peer Editing Questions for an Argumentative Essay
- Argumentative essay peer edit
- 50 Argumentative Essay Topics
- Love what you have because you can't always have what you love
Be sure to address each of the main categories listed on the form. Copy and paste into your review as much of this form as needed to clearly structure your comments.
Indicate in your review which column in each category best describes the essay. Well-developed introduction engages the reader and creates interest. Contains detailed background information and a clear explanation of the problem.
Thesis clearly states a significant and compelling position.
Introduction creates interest and contains background information. Thesis clearly states the problem.
Introduction adequately explains the background of the problem, but may lack detail. Thesis states the problem. Background details are a random collection of information, unclear, or not related to the topic. Well developed main points directly related to the thesis. Supporting examples are concrete and detailed. Refutation acknowledges opposing view logically and clearly. Conclusion effectively wraps up and goes beyond restating the thesis. Commentary is logical, and well thought out.
Three or more main points are related to the thesis, but one may lack details. Refutation paragraph acknowledges the opposing view and summarizes points. Conclusion effectively summarizes topics.
Commentary is present. Refutation missing or vague. Conclusion does not summarize main points. Commentary is not present. Logical progression of ideas with a clear structure that enhances the thesis. Transitions are mature and graceful.
Writing is smooth, skillful, coherent. Sentences are strong and expressive with varied structure. Diction is consistent and words well chosen. Punctuation, spelling, capitalization are correct. No errors.
Peer Editing Questions for an Argumentative Essay
Diction is consistent. Punctuation, spelling, capitalization are generally correct, with few errors. Writing is clear, but sentences may lack variety. Diction is appropriate. A few errors in punctuation, spelling, capitalization. Writing is confusing, hard to follow. Inappropriate diction. Distracting errors in punctuation, spelling, capitalization.
Comment on the sentence structure, punctuation and capitalization Comments:. Sources are smoothly and logically integrated into the text, and clearly explain the ideas.
Argumentative essay peer edit
Accurate format. Sources are relevant and reliable. Sources are integrated into the text, and accurately documented using correct format. Source material is used.
Sources are accurately documented, may contain a few minor errors in format.
50 Argumentative Essay Topics
Format is incorrect for all sources. Locate these items: refutation paragraph - acknowledges and summarizes the opposing view body paragraphs 3 - each begins with a topic sentence and contains detailed supporting information conclusion summarizes the paper's main points suggestions for change are included in conclusion Comments:. Logical progression of ideas. Transitions are present equally throughout essay.
Organization is clear. Transitions are present. No discernable organization. Transitions are not present.
Love what you have because you can't always have what you love
What is the organizational pattern? Is it clear? Can you circle at least one or two transitions in every paragraph? Locate these items: underline or circle each source referred to in the essay. Comments: Overall, what is good about the essay? What needs more work? Locate and mark or underline these three items in the introductory paragraph: background information an explanation of the controversy a clear thesis statement Comments.
Overall, what is good about the essay?